The Senate might save cable, because Charter sure can’t
Cable TV has spent the last five years watching streaming video not-so-slowly nibble away at its cash cow, and the solution has mostly been to raise "programming fees" every year. Although the industry has enjoyed decades of heady profits and regional monopolies, streaming packages are becoming increasingly popular and cable isn't doing much to compete.
So in a way, cable companies should be embracing a Senate bill recently introduced by Massachusetts senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, both Democrats, that would force Charter to carry some specific Boston affiliate channels, rather than the Albany versions. It's a relatively minor bill, but increased Congressional action to sort out the nightmare of out-of-market sports and TV blackouts would be a great thing, and one that could lower people's frustration with cable and make them less likely to defect.
BGR Top Deals:
- Cable companies are furious that we’re telling everyone about this $50 box
- Add a gigabit Ethernet port to any room in 5 seconds with this $50 device
Trending Right Now:
- The Solo 5 is a Bose sound bar you can actually afford
- Yet another Marvel star confirms her character survived ‘Avengers: Infinity War’
- Today’s best deals: World’s strongest coffee, Harmony Hub bundle, Instant Pot, $21 Wi-Fi extender, more
The Senate might save cable, because Charter sure can’t originally appeared on BGR.com on Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 23:34:39 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.